Council of State, 7 April 2026, n°499350
The Council of State rules that a person belonging to a group entity other than the company employing a protected employee may conduct the latter’s dismissal procedure and, in particular, chair the meeting at which the works council (Comité social et économique) was consulted on the proposed dismissal, request the authorization to terminate the employment contract, and sign the dismissal letter.
In this case, a company sought administrative authorization to dismiss a protected employee. Following a refusal, the Minister of Labor, having been referred to on a hierarchical appeal, overturned that decision and authorized the dismissal. This decision was upheld by the administrative court of appeal.
The Council of State, hearing an appeal brought by the employee, reaffirmed the general principle that an employer cannot delegate to a person external to the company the authority to conduct a dismissal procedure, but then confirmed the validity of the dismissal on this case on the grounds that:
A few days earlier, the Court of cassation had set out two criteria for an employee to validly sign the dismissal letter of a colleague from another entity within the same group:
The Council of State’s ruling illustrates a situation in which one entity exercises such authority over another.